<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Physics of IT &#8211; What Have We Learned?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://russaebig.com/directionallycorrect/2009/08/09/physics-of-it-what-have-we-learned/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://russaebig.com/directionallycorrect/2009/08/09/physics-of-it-what-have-we-learned/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>Thoughts About the Corporate World We Live In</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 03:45:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Gies</title>
		<link>http://russaebig.com/directionallycorrect/2009/08/09/physics-of-it-what-have-we-learned/comment-page-1/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Gies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 15:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://russaebig.com/directionallycorrect/?p=530#comment-80</guid>
		<description>This is a good piece of content, I was wondering if I could use this blog on my website, I will link it back to your website though. If this is a problem please let me know and I will take it down right away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a good piece of content, I was wondering if I could use this blog on my website, I will link it back to your website though. If this is a problem please let me know and I will take it down right away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ Aebig</title>
		<link>http://russaebig.com/directionallycorrect/2009/08/09/physics-of-it-what-have-we-learned/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ Aebig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 15:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://russaebig.com/directionallycorrect/?p=530#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Thank you Vaughan, I have enjoyed writing it and look forward to doing a deeper dive at some point.  While there are many other topics to write about, I do look forward to returning to Physics of IT at some point and peel the onion a little by incorporating related concepts from the blogosphere, as well as tools and techniques for application of the concepts identified to date.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Vaughan, I have enjoyed writing it and look forward to doing a deeper dive at some point.  While there are many other topics to write about, I do look forward to returning to Physics of IT at some point and peel the onion a little by incorporating related concepts from the blogosphere, as well as tools and techniques for application of the concepts identified to date.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vaughan Merlyn</title>
		<link>http://russaebig.com/directionallycorrect/2009/08/09/physics-of-it-what-have-we-learned/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Vaughan Merlyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 13:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://russaebig.com/directionallycorrect/?p=530#comment-22</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve enjoyed this series!  I&#039;ve always used lots of analogies in my consulting, writing and teaching - I think they help enormously.  Some of the take-away&#039;s for me from the analogy of IT organizational change with the properties of physics are best captured in your excellent mindmap in this post - there are many &quot;moving parts&quot; and they all interact with each other.  If you want to change one aspect, you have to consider all the other interconnected aspects.  i.e., changes to IT must be holistic and those changes must be made with careful consideration of the unintended consequences of a given change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve enjoyed this series!  I&#8217;ve always used lots of analogies in my consulting, writing and teaching &#8211; I think they help enormously.  Some of the take-away&#8217;s for me from the analogy of IT organizational change with the properties of physics are best captured in your excellent mindmap in this post &#8211; there are many &#8220;moving parts&#8221; and they all interact with each other.  If you want to change one aspect, you have to consider all the other interconnected aspects.  i.e., changes to IT must be holistic and those changes must be made with careful consideration of the unintended consequences of a given change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

