<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Directionally Correct &#187; EUC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://russaebig.com/directionallycorrect/tag/euc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://russaebig.com/directionallycorrect</link>
	<description>Thoughts About the Corporate World We Live In</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 10:14:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>In Our Systems We Trust</title>
		<link>http://russaebig.com/directionallycorrect/2009/09/27/in-our-systems-we-trust/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://russaebig.com/directionallycorrect/2009/09/27/in-our-systems-we-trust/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 07:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Russ Aebig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[People / Talent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[end user computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EUC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://russaebig.com/directionallycorrect/?p=702</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why do we place so much faith in our software systems?  Is it that we feel that they are without flaw, or that we are comfortable working around the flaws? <a href="http://russaebig.com/directionallycorrect/2009/09/27/in-our-systems-we-trust/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://russaebig.com/directionallycorrect/2009/09/27/in-our-systems-we-trust/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Problem With Ease of Use</title>
		<link>http://russaebig.com/directionallycorrect/2009/04/13/the-problem-with-ease-of-use/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://russaebig.com/directionallycorrect/2009/04/13/the-problem-with-ease-of-use/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 05:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Russ Aebig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BPE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ease of use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[end user computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EUC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[simplicity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://directionallycorrect.wordpress.com/?p=146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ease of use is something which is highly desired.  Industries are built around it.  Intellectual property laws allow entrepreneurs to innovate to make almost anything easier to do.  In the 1980's and 1990's companies would spend a great deal of time and money on business process (re)engineering.  The end goal was to have processes and systems which were easier to perform and easier to use.    While it was recognized that this would be expensive, the elusive "ease of use / ease to perform"  was thought to be well worth it when all was said and done. <a href="http://russaebig.com/directionallycorrect/2009/04/13/the-problem-with-ease-of-use/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://russaebig.com/directionallycorrect/2009/04/13/the-problem-with-ease-of-use/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

