<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Directionally Correct &#187; technologies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://russaebig.com/directionallycorrect/tag/technologies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://russaebig.com/directionallycorrect</link>
	<description>Thoughts About the Corporate World We Live In</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 10:14:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Tomorrow&#8217;s IT Infrastructure</title>
		<link>http://russaebig.com/directionallycorrect/2011/03/27/tomorrows-it-infrastructure/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://russaebig.com/directionallycorrect/2011/03/27/tomorrows-it-infrastructure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2011 12:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Russ Aebig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vision]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://russaebig.com/directionallycorrect/?p=1156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[...Fast forward yourself 5 years into the future where you are the leader of your company's IT organization. What does your infrastructure like? This is an interesting question. First of all, the question "will your company have an IT infrastructure?"... <a href="http://russaebig.com/directionallycorrect/2011/03/27/tomorrows-it-infrastructure/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://russaebig.com/directionallycorrect/2011/03/27/tomorrows-it-infrastructure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Technical Architecture &#8211; Static or Active?</title>
		<link>http://russaebig.com/directionallycorrect/2009/06/18/technical-architecture-static-or-active/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
		<comments>http://russaebig.com/directionallycorrect/2009/06/18/technical-architecture-static-or-active/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Russ Aebig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obsolesence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technologies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://directionallycorrect.wordpress.com/?p=233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What happens when the technology platform which you have adopted is eclipsed by newer more efficient or effective technology?  It is easy for this to happen.  The decisions made today will have a shelf life.  Vendors of software platforms are frequently purchased leaving the acquired platform in limbo.  Different technologies and platforms which perform similar roles can gain more market traction leaving the chosen platform in question.  <a href="http://russaebig.com/directionallycorrect/2009/06/18/technical-architecture-static-or-active/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://russaebig.com/directionallycorrect/2009/06/18/technical-architecture-static-or-active/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

